The Use of Quality Pedagogic Language in the Teaching of English in Indonesian Setting

Didi Suherdi


ABSTRACT: The implementation of new curriculum into the teaching of English in Indonesia requires new ways of doing classroom practices. This article is intended to prtesent the result of a research conducted by a team of researchers (Suherdi, Yusuf & Muslim, 2007) in an SMA (Sekolah Menengah Atas or Senior High School) in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia to ascertain the effectiveness of the use of quality pedagogic language in improving students’ achievement in English. For that purpose, an experiment has bee done in a first grade class. Using a quasi-experimental design, the class has been taught using the language thus far used by the teacher in the first six meetings, and using the quality pedagogic language in the following six meetings. Prior to the first meetings, a pre-test was conducted to ascertain students’ learning achivement before the treatment. Then, a post-test was conducted at the end of the experiment. The result of the data analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test means in the English competence, and no difference in those of their effective factors. Possible explanations to these unlinear patterns of findings have been presented and relevant recommendations have been given both for theoretical and practical aspects of English teaching, especially in schooling system.

KEY WORDS: Pedagogic language, teachers’ questions, feedback, pauses, discourse analysis, affective factors, and teaching of English.

About the Author: Prof. Dr. H. Didi Suherdi is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of English Education, Faculty of Language and Art Education UPI (Indonesia University of Education), Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi No.229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia. He can be reached at:

How to cite this article? Suherdi, Didi. (2012). “The Use of Quality Pedagogic Language in the Teaching of English in Indonesian Setting” in EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, Vol.4(2) February, pp.111-124. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press owned by ASPENSI in Bandung, West Java; and FKIP UMP in Purwokerto, Central Java, ISSN 1979-7877.

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (December 12, 2011); Revised (January 23, 2012); and Published (February 17, 2012).

Full Text:



Berry, Margaret. (1981a). “Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-Approach to Exchange Structure” in R.M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery [eds]. Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Berry, Margaret. (1981b). “Towards Layers of Exchange Structures for Directive Exchanges” in Network, 2.

Dantonio, Marylou & Paul C. Beisenherz. (2001). Learning to Question, Questioning to Learn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Ellis, Rod. (1994). The Study of Second Language Aquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Good, Thomas L. & Jere E. Brophy. (2000). Looking in Classrooms. New York: Longman.

Hunkins, Francis P. (1995). Teaching Thinking Through Effective Questioning. Boston: Christopher-Gordon.

Lyster, R. & L. Ranta. (1997). “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms” in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, pp.37-66.

News on “Penggugat Ujian Nasional Menang, Hakim Nilai Pemerintah Lalai” in the newspaper of Tribun Jabar. Bandung, Indonesia: 22 May 2007.

News on “SBY-JK Lawan Putusan Pengadilan, Tunjuk Jaksa Agung sebagai Kuasa Hukum” in the newspaper of Tribun Jabar. Bandung, Indonesia: 23 May 2007.

Nunan, David. (1989). Understanding Language Classrooms. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall.

Orlich, Donald C. et al. (1985). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Better Instruction. Toronto: D.C. Heath and Company, second edtion.

Rose, Sari & John Litcher. (1998). “Effective Questioning Techniques in Theory and Practice” in Leah P. Mccoy & Winston Salem [eds]. Studies in Teaching. New York: Wake Forest University.

Rosenshine, Barak, Carla Maisster & Saul Chapman. (1996). “Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of Intervention Studies” in Review of Educational Research, 66, pp.181-221.

Samson, Gordon E. et al. (1987). “The Effects of Teacher Questioning Levels on Student Achievement: A Quantitative Synthesis” in Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), pp.290-295.

Sinclair, J.M. & R.M. Coulthard. (1975). Towards and Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sterling, Theodor D. & Seymor V. Pollack. (1974). ”Ideal Teaching Machine: A Solution to the Pedagogic Language Problem” in Communication of the ACM Archive, Vol.17, Issue 4 [April], pp.207-208.

Suherdi, Didi. (1999). “Teaching-Learning Processes in Two Different Contexts: A comparative Study in EFL and ESL Contexts” in Proceedings in the 47th International TEFLIN Conference in Batu, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.

Suherdi, Didi. (2000). “Pola Wacana Kelas Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SLTP: Sebuah Studi Kasus di SLTP Berinput Menengah di Bandung”. Unpublished Research Report. Bandung: UPI (Indonesia University of Education).

Suherdi, Didi. (2005). ”Efektivitas Model Ajar Berorientasi Kompetensi Berbasis Interaksi Afeksional (MABKBIA) dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia”. Unpublished Dr. Dissertation. Bandung: Postgraduate Program UPI (Indonesia University of Education).

Suherdi, Didi. (2006). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Systemiotic Perspective. Bandung: UPI Press.

Suherdi, Didi. (2007). “Karakteristik Pertanyaan dan Umpan Balik Guru dalam PBM Bahasa Indonesia di SLTP: Sebuah Studi Komparatif PBM-PBM dalam Dua MABKBIA dan MAR di SLTP Berinput Menengah di Bandung”. Unpublished Research Report. Bandung: UPI (Indonesia University of Education).

Suherdi, Didi, Fazri N. Yusuf & Ahmad B. Muslim. (2007). “Efektivitas Penggunaan Bahasa Pedagogis Berkualitas Tinggi dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di SMA Laboratorium (Lab School) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia”. Unpublished Research Report. Bandung: UPI (Indonesia University of Education).

Thornbury, S. (1996). “Teachers Research Teacher Talk” in ELT Journal, 50/4, pp.279-287.

Ventola, Eija. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction. London: Frances Pinter.

Ventola, Eija. (1988a). “Text Analysis in Operation: A Multi-Level Approach” in R.P. Fawcett & D. Young [eds]. New Developments in Systemic Linguistics. London: Pinter.

Ventola, Eija. (1988b). “The Logical Relations in Exchanges” in J. Benson & W.S. Greaves [eds]. Systemic Perspectives on Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Wilen, William. (1987). Questions, Questioning Techniques, and Effective Teaching. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 EDUCARE

Lisensi Creative Commons

EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies. Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional

View My Stats