Integrated Intelligence Practice to Motivate Low Achievement Students in the History Subject
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The teachers were expected to apply a new approach with various teaching activities to motivate students to learn. The sample consisted of 68 low achievers’ students, who were then divided into two groups: 34 students were treated in the treatment group, while another 34 students were put in the control group. This is a quasi-experiment of non equivalent control group design. The questionnaire was distributed to students of both groups, to test the effectiveness of the integration approach. Analysis of the mean and standard deviation was conducted for both groups, while the null hypothesis was tested by the t-test. Based on the pre-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The post-test recorded significant motivational differences between the two groups studied. It was determined that the integrated History lesson with multiple intelligences had increased the level of motivation among students in the treatment group. This shows, that diversity of methods and activities undertaken, were able to change students’ perception about the History subject and had increased their interests to learn History. Hence, integrated multiple intelligence activities are able to increase students' motivation to learn the History.
KEY WORD: Integrated multiple intelligence, students’ motivation, readiness to learn, history subject, new approach, and teachers’ teaching practices.
IKHTISAR: “Amalan Kecerdasan Bersepadu untuk Memberi Motivasi kepada Pelajar-pelajar Berpencapaian Rendah dalam Subjek Sejarah”. Guru-guru diharapkan dapat melaksanakan pendekatan baru melalui aktiviti yang pelbagai bagi memberi dorongan kepada pelajar untuk belajar. Sampel yang terlibat terdiri daripada 68 orang pelajar berpencapaian rendah, yang dibahagikan kepada dua kumpulan, iaitu: 34 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan serta 34 orang lagi pelajar kumpulan kawalan. Kajian ini berbentuk kuasi eksperimen kumpulan tidak setara. Bagi menguji keberkesanan integrasi teori kecerdasan pelbagai, soal selidik digunakan ke atas pelajar dari kedua-dua kumpulan. Analisis min dan sisihan piawai digunakan ke atas kedua-dua kumpulan, manakala bagi menguji hipotesis nul, ujian t digunakan. Berdasarkan ujian pada peringkat pra, tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan antara kedua-dua kumpulan. Dalam ujian pada peringkat pos pula terdapat perbezaan motivasi belajar antara kedua-dua kumpulan. Didapati bahawa pengajaran bersepadu dengan kecerdasan pelbagai telah meningkatkan faktor dorongan dalam kalangan pelajar kumpulan rawatan. Hal ini menunjukkan kepelbagaian kaedah dan aktiviti yang dilaksanakan telah dapat mengubah persepsi pelajar tentang mata pelajaran Sejarah serta meningkatkan kesediaan mereka untuk belajar Sejarah. Oleh itu, aktiviti kecerdasan pelbagai bersepadu dapat meningkatkan dorongan pelajar untuk belajar Sejarah.
KATA KUNCI: Kecerdasan pelbagai bersepadu, dorongan pelajar, sedia untuk belajar, mata pelajaran sejarah, pendekatan baru, dan amalan pengajaran guru.
About the Authors: Assoc. Prof. Dato’ Dr. Haji Abdul Razaq Ahmad and Fadzilah Sulaiman are the Lecturers at the Faculty of Education UKM (National University of Malaysia), Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. For academic interests, the authors can be contacted via e-mail at: razaq.ukm@gmail.com
How to cite this article? Razaq Ahmad, Abdul & Fadzilah Sulaiman. (2015). “Integrated Intelligence Practice to Motivate Low Achievement Students in the History Subject” in SUSURGALUR: Jurnal Kajian Sejarah & Pendidikan Sejarah, Vol.3(1), Maret, pp.57-70. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press and UBD Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam, ISSN 2302-5808.
Chronicle of the article: Accepted (December 18, 2014); Revised (January 25, 2015); and Published (March 24, 2015).
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abd Rashid, Abd Rahim. (1989). KBSM: History Teaching Strategies. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti.
Abdul Khakin Samuri, Abdul Hakim @. (2004). “Secondary School Students Attitudes toward History Subject”. Unpublished Master Thesis. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Abdul Rahman, Wan Rafeei. (1977). “The Achievement of Motivational Education in Malaysia” in Jurnal Pendidikan, 6, pp.40-43.
Anderson, Lorin W. & David R. Krathwohl [eds]. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. USA [United States of America]: Paperback, Abridged Edition.
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD [Association for Supervisions and Curriculum Development].
Aziz, Zahara & Nik Azleena Nik Ismail. (2007). “The Impacts of Action Research on History Teachers’ Readiness to Implement History Thinking Skills” in Jurnal Pendidikan, 32, pp.119-137.
Azwar, Saifuddin. (1997). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.
Borg, W.R. & M.D. Gall. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman, fifth edition.
Bruer, J. (1993). School for Taught: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. Cambridge: MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] Press.
CCD [Center of Curriculum Development]. (2001). Pedagogical Modules for the Application of Multiple Intelligence Theory in Teaching and Learning. Kuala Lumpur: MoE [Ministry of Education] Malaysia.
Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational Research in Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating: Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, second edition.
Daud, Salwani. (2003). “The Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning Modules towards Low Achievement Students in the Form Four History Subject”. Unpublished Research Project. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Davies, C.J. (1975). The Slow Learners in the Secondary School. New York: Warlock Educational.
Dickinson, A.K. & P.J. Lee. (1978). History Teaching and Historical Knowledge. London: Heineman.
Eccles, J.S., C. Midgley & T.F. Adler. (1984). “Grade-Related Changes in the School Environment: Effects on Achievement Motivation” in J.G. Nicholls [ed]. The Development of Achievement Motivation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp.283-331.
Entwistle, N.J & J.D. Wilson. (1970). “Personality, Study Methods, and Academic Performance” in University Quarterly, 24, pp.147-156.
Fatah Hassan, Abd. (1998). Comprehensive Thinking. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Gardner, Howard. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Harper & Row.
Gottfried, A.E. (1985). “Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Elementary and Junior High School Students” in Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, pp.631-645.
Griffin, D. (1978). Slow Learners, a Break in the Circle: A Practical Guide for the Teachers. London: The Wobura Press.
Haji Ashaari, Omardin & Yunus Muhammad. (1996). The Methods of Teaching History. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Hashim, Shahabuddin, Rohizani Yaakub & Mohd Zohir Ahmad. (2007). Strategic Pedagogy and Effective Teching Techniques. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional.
High, G. (1977). Teaching Slow Learners. London: Maurice Temple Smith Ltd.
Mahmood, Maharom. (1998). “Analysing History Thinking Skill in the Curriculum for the Lower Secondary”. Unpublished Master Thesis. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Md Ibrahim, Roslan. (2007). “The Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning Modules towards Low Achievement Students in the Economic Subject”. Unpublished Master Thesis. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Meichenbaum, D. & A. Biemiller. (1998). Nurturing Independent Learner: Helping Student Take Charge of Their Learning. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Phillips, J.A. (1993). “Cognitive Teaching Strategies in Improving Academic Achievement of Low Achievers” in Challenges of Malaysian Education: Special Edition. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Faculty of Education UM [University of Malaya].
Pierce, C. (1998). “Importance of Classroom Climate for at Risk Learners” in Journal of Educational Research, 88(1), pp.37-42.
Pintrich, P.R. & E.V. De Grrot. (1990). “Motivational and Self Regulated Learning Component of Classroom Academic Performance” in Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp.33-40.
Shahkat Ali, Sakhilah. (1998). “Student’s Motivation: 6 Influencing Factors”. Unpublished Master Thesis. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Solfitri, Titi. (2007). “The Effects of Jigwas III Cooperative Learning towards Motivation and Mathematic Achievement among Secondary Students of Pekan Baru, Riau, Indonesia”. Unpublished Research Project. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Stake, R.E. (2000). “Case Studies” in N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln [eds]. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, second edition, pp.435-454.
Stipek, D. (1988). Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sugiyono, S. (2007). Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung, Indonesia: Penerbit Rosda Karya.
Yin, R.K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research. Newbury Park, USA [United States of America]: Sage.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, USA [United States of America]: Sage.
Zaiton Hanafi, Nor. (2006). “Attitudes and Motivation among Secondary School Students towards Learning the Malay Proverbs”. Unpublished Project Paper. Bangi, Selangor: UKM [Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2121/susurgalur.v3i1.94
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.2121/susurgalur.v3i1.94.g94
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
SUSURGALUR: Jurnal Kajian Sejarah & Pendidikan Sejarah. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License