History Teaching, Thinking Development, and Transforming Society
Abstract
ABSTRACT: History teaching is defined as the transmission of historical knowledge to people who do not yet have such knowledge. As a discipline, history concerns itself with a scientific study of the past. In the age of globalization, there is a need to reassess the way schools perceive and approach the subject and teaching of history, especially when it has become part of what we call “service courses” – subjects in our schools that exist in order to satisfy the requisites of the implementing educational agency. Historical knowledge, with the current trends in education, has been contested. Also teaching history within the classroom has been challenged due to the question of practicality of historical knowledge. Some cynics argued that historical knowledge will not provide much help, especially in solving pressing issues and problems. This assumption about history’s impractical knowledge resulted to the relegation of the study of the past to the margins. Likewise, teaching history has not merited the prestige of the so-called “usable subjects”. Thus, rethinking history’s practicality and the usability of such knowledge should be incorporated with the teaching of the subject.
KEY WORD: History, history teaching, development, school, society, service courses, usable subjects, and rethinking history.
IKHTISAR: “Pengajaran Sejarah, Perkembangan Berpikir, dan Transformasi Masyarakat”. Pengajaran sejarah didefinisikan sebagai transmisi pengetahuan sejarah kepada masyarakat dari yang belum tahu menjadi tahu. Sebagai sebuah disiplin ilmu, sejarah hirau dengan masalah kajian ilmiah pada masa lalu. Di era globalisasi, ada kebutuhan untuk menilai kembali cara sekolah memahami dan mendekati subjek dan pengajaran sejarah, terutama ketika telah menjadi bagian dari apa yang kita sebut “program layanan” – dimana mata pelajaran yang ada di sekolah kita untuk memenuhi syarat dari lembaga pelaksana pendidikan. Pengetahuan sejarah, dengan kecenderungan saat ini dalam pendidikan, telah dipertaruhkan. Juga mengajar sejarah didalam kelas telah ditantang karena masalah kepraktisan pengetahuan sejarah. Beberapa yang sinis berpendapat bahwa pengetahuan sejarah tidak akan memberikan banyak bantuan, terutama dalam memecahkan berbagai masalah dan isu yang mendesak. Asumsi tentang pengetahuan sejarah yang kurang praktis ini mengakibatkan degradasi studi masa lalu yang terpinggirkan. Karenanya, mengajar sejarah belum memiliki kelayakan prestise yang disebut "mata pelajaran siap-pakai". Jadi, memikirkan kembali pengetahuan sejarah yang praktis dan berguna harus dimasukkan dalam pengajaran sejarah.
KATA KUNCI: Sejarah, pengajaran sejarah, pembangunan, sekolah, masyarakat, program layanan, pelajaran yang berguna, dan memikirkan kembali sejarah.
About the Author: Assist. Prof. Wensley M. Reyes is currently a faculty member of the Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences PNU (Philippine Normal University) in Manila, the Philippines. He has earned from the University of the Philippines – Diliman his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in the discipline of History in 2002 and 2010 respectively. His e-mail address is: reyes.wm@pnu.edu.ph
How to cite this article? Reyes, Wensley M. (2014). “History Teaching, Thinking Development, and Transforming Society” in SUSURGALUR: Jurnal Kajian Sejarah & Pendidikan Sejarah, Vol.2(2), September, pp.171-178. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press and UBD Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam, ISSN 2302-5808.
Chronicle of the article: Accepted (August 14, 2014); Revised (September 2, 2014); and Published (September 24, 2014).
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AHA [American Historical Association]. (2011). Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct. Washington D.C., USA: American Historical Association.
Ayers, William. (2004). Teaching toward Freedom. Boston: Beacon Press.
Banks, James A. & Cherry A. McGee Banks [eds]. (2010). Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives. USA: Wiley, seventh edition.
Brown, Paul B. (2014). “The Best Way to Predict the Future”. Available [online] also at: http://www.inc.com/paul-b-brown/the-best-way-to-predict-the-future.html [accessed in Manila, the Philippines: August 12, 2014].
Collingwood, R.G. (2014). The Idea of History. New York: Martino Fine Books, first edition in 1946.
Constantino, Renato & L.R. Constantino. (1993). The Philippines: A Past Revisited. Quezon City: Renato Constantino.
Cowen, M. & R.W. Sheton. (1996). Doctrines of Development. Lonodon: Routledge.
Gilderhaus, Mark. (1996). History and Historians: A Historiographical Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., third edition.
Herbert, Wray. (2012). “Imagining the Future Involves Your Memory: Why We Tend to Predict Rosy Times Ahead”, on May 7, 2012. Available [online] also at: www.scientificamerican.com [accessed in Manila, the Philippines: August 12, 2014].
Langer, Ellen. (1997). The Power of Mindful Learning. USA: Da Capo Press.
Mills, C. Wright (1959). The Sociological Imagination. USA: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Kishlansky, Mark, Patrick Geary & Patricia O’Brien. (1995). Civilization in the West. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers, 2nd edition.
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. (2010). Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions. Singapore: SAGE Publication Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd, second edition.
Rizal, Jose. (1887). Noli Me Tangere. Makati City: Bookmark, translated by Ma Soledad Lacson-Locsin in 1996.
Woolcock, M. Szreter & V.S. Rao. (2010). “How and Why Does History Matter for Development Policy?” in Policy Research Working Paper 5425. New York: The World Bank Development Research Group.
www.nchs.ucla.edu/history-standards/historical-thinking-standards/overview [accessed in Manila, the Philippines: August 13, 2014].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2121/susurgalur.v2i2.83
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.2121/susurgalur.v2i2.83.g84
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
SUSURGALUR: Jurnal Kajian Sejarah & Pendidikan Sejarah. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License